article Article Summary
Feb 24, 2025
Blog Image

Undergraduate students show a discrepancy between their AI application competence and understanding of AI principles, with confidence in AI tools being influenced more by perceived tool limitations than personal ability.

Undergraduate students show a discrepancy between their AI application competence and understanding of AI principles, with confidence in AI tools being influenced more by perceived tool limitations than personal ability.

Objective: To understand how differences in AI confidence and knowledge influence students' relationships with AI by examining undergraduate perspectives to redefine AI literacy and inform curriculum development.

Methods:

  • Explanatory sequential mixed methods design
  • Initial AI literacy survey adapted from Ng et al. with 84 respondents
  • Focus group interviews with 8 participants
  • Survey analyzed using R and ggplot2
  • Data collection through Spring-Summer 2024
  • Analysis of both quantitative and qualitative responses

Key Findings:

  • Students showed higher competence in using AI applications than understanding underlying AI principles
  • Significant gender differences in AI confidence levels between males and females
  • Student confidence in AI's capability as a learning tool was limited by beliefs about AI tool efficacy rather than personal ability
  • Students believed AI literacy would benefit students across all fields
  • Participants viewed AI's integration into the workforce positively, though saw it as inevitable
  • Lower correlation between AI confidence and knowledge than expected

Implications:

  • Need to differentiate between AI application knowledge and understanding of AI principles
  • Importance of combining surveys with objective assessments
  • Value of considering both confidence in using AI and confidence in AI's capabilities
  • Need for targeted support to address gender-related disparities
  • Potential for AI literacy to bridge workplace equity gaps

Limitations:

  • Small focus group sample size (n=8)
  • Survey may not distinguish between tool usage and understanding
  • Potential overestimation of AI knowledge due to tool familiarity
  • Limited geographic diversity
  • Gender imbalance in survey respondents

Future Directions:

  • Development of more nuanced assessment tools
  • Research on gender-related disparities in AI confidence
  • Investigation of actual versus perceived AI knowledge
  • Studies on effective AI literacy curriculum development
  • Exploration of AI's role in workplace equity

Title and Authors: "Leveraging Undergraduate Perspectives to Redefine AI Literacy" by Jack Ebert and Kristina Kramarczuk

Published On: To be presented February 26-March 1, 2025

Published By: Proceedings of the 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (SIGCSE TS 2025)

Related Link

Comments

Please log in to leave a comment.